A while ago, at the workshop Visualising the Public Sphere: Ethics and Politics from YouTube to Google Earth,held on Wednesday 18 February 2009, we presented the project to an audience of VKS researchers and of philosophers from the University of Groningen.
One of the topics of discussion that came up in relation to our presentation had to do with the concept ‘realism’. Why, asked Hans Harbers, were we using such an ontological term, when our approach so clearly addresses epistemological questions? In a first instance, several meanings of realism were laid out, and we signaled that not all of these were germane to our project. (For example, one of the uses we want to make of realism is in contrast to the ‘cyber’ or ‘virtual’ claims about Internet-mediated reality, in order to draw attention to the consequential and material practices to which the images are put.)
Later on, in the closing discussion, Paul Wouters returned to this issue, urging us not to be too quick to agree to disagree. What does it mean that different currents have appealed to the term realism? How, precisely, do these projects differ, intellectually and politically?
Since then, I’ve been noting all the ways in which realism arises in the various material we produce, consult and use, and how it is often set up as part of a dichotomy (as, indeed, we have been using it to set up a contrast with the virtual): Realism/Romanticism, realism/constructivism, etc. All these oppositional uses of the term have a different history and political valence. The variety of axes along which realism can be placed is probably also the underlying reason why several wise readers of drafts of the project proposal suggested we remove the term. Indeed, there are good reasons not to have a ‘can of worms’ in a project proposal, but, perhaps perversely, I kind of like the arresting (and for some, irratating) connotations of the word. So we’ll be sticking with it for now, taking on board that a careful and judicious use of the term will mean constantly foregrounding what we mean by it. And this in turn requires being attuned to the various meanings of the term for our audiences, including current reflexive and revisionist projects around Realism.